The Entire City Should Be Brought Up On Charges
This is discrimination and hate speech perpetuated by an entire city:
City Council Passes Motions Criticizing Marines Office
[...] “By taking a stand against recruitment we are protecting the health and safety of our youth,” said PhoeBe sorgen, a member of the Berkeley Peace and Justice Commission. “I see the protest as taking a proud and courageous stand.” [...]
Code Pink, a national anti-war grassroots organization, will be granted a parking spot for their regular Wednesday afternoon protests and will not need to apply for a sound permit for the next six months, under one resolution.
The other resolution more directly criticizes the presence of the center in Berkeley. The city manager was directed to send a letter to the U.S. Marine Corps saying they are “uninvited and unwelcome intruders” in the city.
In addition, the city attorney has been directed to investigate whether the city’s anti-discrimination laws can be enforced at the center, based on the military’s consideration of sexual orientation in hiring. [...]
Bring the recruiting center up on anti-discrimination charges? How about bringing yourselves up on the same anti-discrimination laws? Â
First, I’d cut off their outside funding. I know Berkeley enjoys largesse from the federal government. Then, I’d remove all recruiting stations. Then I’d remove the police, the fire department, and ambulances unless they are fully funded by the city itself. Refuse them help by the National Guard as well. They did say the military is uninvited and unwelcome there, didn’t they?
I suppose it’s only hate speech when it’s the other side?
Update: Gotta love Senator DeMint. I wish he was one of my Senators, there are so few like him.
DeMint was angered after learning that the Berkeley City Council voted this week to tell the U.S. Marine Corps to remove its recruiting station from the city’s downtown.
“This is a slap in the face to all brave service men and women and their families,” DeMint said in a prepared statement. “The First Amendment gives the City of Berkeley the right to be idiotic, but from now on they should do it with their own money.”
“If the city can’t show respect for the Marines that have fought, bled and died for their freedom, Berkeley should not be receiving special taxpayer-funded handouts,” he added. [...]
DeMint further talked about legislation to block special earmarks for the city to the tune of at least $2.1 million, including these items:
— $975,000 for the University of California at Berkeley, for the Matsui Center for Politics and Public Service, which may include establishing an endowment, and for cataloguing the papers of Congressman Robert Matsui.
— $750,000 for the Berkeley/Albana ferry service.
— $243,000 for the Chez Panisse Foundation, for a school lunch initiative to integrate lessons about wellness, sustainability and nutrition into the academic curriculum.
— $94,000 for a Berkeley public safety interoperability program.
— $87,000 for the Berkeley Unified School District, nutrition education program.
Berkeley could always ask Code Pink to support them financially when the federal dole dries up, not that its likely to happen because Congress will not vote it in.
Now this is a man who should be President. He is fighting an uphill battle with a liberal Congress but still continues to fight for what is right.
I’m disappointed they are staying away from calling Berkeley’s actions what they really are, which is hate speech and discrimination, but they have the right idea. I suppose telling Berkeley that wouldn’t really help the situation, anyway. They’re obviously too dumb to recognize the fact.
As the right-wing blogosphere railed and a U.S. senator vowed financial retaliation against the Berkeley City Council for its effort to boot the Marine Corps out of town, three war protesters ratcheted up pressure from the left by chaining themselves Friday to the front door of the downtown Marine recruiting office.
Demint’s legisation:
Conservative bloggers and Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., also believe more articulation is necessary – from the opposite side of the political spectrum.
DeMint began drafting legislation Friday to cut $2.1 million in federal funding to Berkeley in a current congressional budget bill and transfer the money to the Marine Corps. The funding would include $750,000 for prospective ferry service, $87,000 for the Berkeley Unified School District nutrition education fund and $243,000 for the Chez Panisse Foundation, which promotes nutritional awareness in school lunch programs.
Berkeley’s repsonse via Councilwoman Dona Spring:
“I guess they’ve never heard of free speech,” Councilwoman Dona Spring said. “I’ve had a lot of nasty phone messages today, threatening me with things like saying, ‘I’ll take you out.’ But they can go ahead. I don’t feel scared.”
Code Pink said it has begun to circulate a petition calling for a Berkeley ballot measure that would make it more difficult to open and operate recruiting stations. The measure would be modeled after anti-pornography laws, organizers said, mandating that – like porn shops – new recruiting offices be subject to public hearings before they would be allowed to locate near homes or schools.
Other responses close to the incident:
“It’s just another protest,” said Marine Corps Capt. Richard Lund, head of the recruiting office.
As he spoke in the early afternoon, with the protesters still chained to his door, a small band of demonstrators on the sidewalk shouted at passing cars and students at Shattuck Square: “Marines out of Berkeley! Marines out of Iraq!”
Heated words were exchanged whenever people tried to enter or leave the office, but the protest was peaceful.
“You guys are just cannon fodder!” the chained protesters shouted at three teenage boys who walked past the office and said they wanted to go inside. “They want to train you to kill babies!” (Emphasis mine.)
The teenagers turned around and left.
At one point, UC Berkeley student Kyrolos El Giheny walked up to the front door and tried to go inside to talk to Lund about a possible Marine career. He was unable to get past the chained protesters.
“They told me, ‘No business as usual today,’ ” El Giheny said. “It’s kind of nutty. It’s really an infringement on my rights.”
I love it when they fall into that baby killer litany. I’d say the left and their pro-choice doctrine have killed more babies than all the wars of the 20th century and the Iraq War put together have killed, unintentionally. I believe the number of abortions total approximately 48,000,000 (48 million)Â since 1973. While some extremely small percentage of those were probably medically necessary, the vast majority of those are intentional. Who are the baby killers?
What’s more they are indeed infringing upon others’ rights as that last young man pointed out but the right wing are the fascists? Those idiots have the right to free speech but as long as they can manage it, nobody else will have the same right.
As much as I cut and pasted here, I left out a whole section of the arrest of the “chainees” and their responses. Read the whole thing.
Posted by Stephanie
February 1st, 2008 at 9:02 pm
That really is the most stupid thing I have heard today–almost couldn’t believe it when I read it. If I were the military I’d just avoid Berkeley totally..
February 1st, 2008 at 9:26 pm
Whenever i hear an organization with the words “peace” or “justice” in their name, my leftie-bull-metre starts going off like mad.
Well said Stephanie, these fools and their supporters should learn from the consequences of their stupidity. They probably think that their freedom is guaranteed because a few fools are willing to bray in the street with some placards. Your idea will teach them, unfortunately i don’t think anyone will teach them that.
February 1st, 2008 at 9:36 pm
I support their right to free speech. I support their right to act like a bunch of ninnies if it so suits them. I don’t support their right to do these things on my dime making me complicit in their hate speech.
You can’t very well jail the whole city but you can darn well make them pay the price for their discrimination.
February 1st, 2008 at 11:45 pm
Don’t forget all the other federal money that we spend on that cesspool. Shut down the post office and all other federal agencies, then cancel all federally funded scholarships to UC Berkeley. Let the city council figure out how to pay for all that stuff themselves.
They City Council in Berkeley has the right to act and talk stupid, but sooner or later they need to learn that sometimes stupidity carries a heavy price.
February 2nd, 2008 at 5:00 am
Oh, yeah, I forgot about those. Thanks, Darrell. er… David. Sorry about that.
February 2nd, 2008 at 2:05 pm
“three war protesters ratcheted up pressure from the left by chaining themselves Friday to the front door ”
Why aren’t people dumping ice water on them all day?
February 2nd, 2008 at 2:51 pm
Rick, because that would be considered assault under the law, but it’s a nice thought.
February 2nd, 2008 at 3:25 pm
Steph and others – Do you not understand that there are already ample laws and regulations to cut off ALL federal funds going into the jurisdiction of Berckley, or are you just ignoring that? There are federal codes that equate the action taken by Berckley, in a time of war, to an offense on the same level with treason. DO NOT ask why the Congress doesn’t pass a law. Ask why Bush DOES NOT ENFORCE existing law.
At this time, it would be problematic to cut off any funds to UC – Berckley, and the entity doing this stupidity is the city, not the university. However all federal contrubutions to local welfare programs could be cut off. All law enforcement assistance grants could be cut off. The federal contribution to local unemployment funds could be cut off. The federal contribution to the local school system could be cut off. Any federal assistance to first responders could be cut off. This list is NOT exhaustive, there are more assistance funding programs that could be cut.
Now if UC – Berckley also disrupts the legal actions of military recruiters on their campus, then current laws and regulations call for the termination of federal funding to the universtiy. That would include all things like Pell Grants, federal assistance with student loans, any federal assistance that went to university departments and/or professors. Any and all research and development contracts between the federal government and the university could be terminated and the school removed from the list of schools eligable to bid on federal contracts. This list is not exhaustive as to the assistance that could be terminated against the university in such a case. There are now a whole list of universities across the country, mostly on the left coast and in New England, that qualify to be cut off from federal funds because of interferance with the lawful duties of our military recruiters, our ROTC programs, and other military related functions. President Bush steadfastly refuses to demand that the completely just and lawful terminations of federal assistance take place.
If Bush would insist that the feds use the laws and regulations already available to them, the immediate result would be to cut tens of billions of dollars out of the federal outlay. The secondary result, which would follow in short order, would be that the offending institutions would get right in a New York minute. The next result would be lawsuits, but that cures nothing in the short term, and anyway the point would have been made, and institutions and other government levels would come to attention and salute the flag. It would be the same as when Reagan fired the air traffic controllers. He warned them first, but they didn’t believe him, so he fired them. The court cases ensued, if you remember, but he was perfectly within his rights, and you haven’t seen a similiar defiant action by unions representing the federal government since. That is what the big fuss was about when the Dept. of Homeland Security was formed. The unions wanted to be exempt from the “no strike” clause applied to law enforcement and public welfare agencies. The unions lost the battle.
I guess that being a “Compassionate Conservative” means never having to be a meanie by enforcing the laws as written, if it hurts anybody at all, even one’s opponents. Bush ‘41′ said that he was going to be kinder and gentler then Reagan, and now his son is more compassionate.
February 2nd, 2008 at 3:50 pm
Caleb, I’ve about had it with “compassionate” conservatism myself. I didn’t know there were tons of laws on the books already but expecting anyone to enforce them isn’t what government is about these days. It’s about giving morons jobs to do nothing and growing bigger and bigger and bigger. However, I will still support DeMint’s fight to cut out the new earmarks for Berkeley. Maybe that alone will be enough to make them start thinking long and hard about what they’re really doing.
Or they can ask Code Pink to reimburse them for the lost funds.
February 2nd, 2008 at 4:51 pm
Does anyone but me remember how Richard Nixon finally forced the Nation to accept integration of the school.
He cut off all federal funds. Within a short period of time, there were no more segregated schools.
We already have the precedent and the laws. When is this going to happen?
The first Presidental candidate to say that he will cut off the funds to Marin County, University of California, and the City of San Francisco will get my vote.
February 2nd, 2008 at 5:59 pm
You wouldn’t believe what they’re saying about this and DeMint.I don’t know whether to add them as updates or make a new blog post. It’s beyond disgusting.
February 16th, 2008 at 10:32 pm
[...] been blogging this topic on Hang Right, here and here. Today, I stumbled upon this article about the day Move America Forward began their [...]